Skip to content
Tier A — Frontier
Runs in:USMade in:United States

Retirement date

The provider lists May 19, 2027 as a tentative retirement date. The model is available as usual today.

Google Gemini

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Tier A — Frontier · 1.048576M tokens

Tokonomix Editorial Team·Reviewed by Mes Kalkan·

Gemini 3.5 Flash sits in Google's speed-optimized lane, trading some reasoning headroom for fast, cheap throughput across a massive context window.

Tokonomix model desk
Section 01

Speed analysis

Latency measured across all benchmark runs. P50 (median) and P95 (95th percentile) give a realistic picture of response speed under normal and peak load.

P50 latency (median)P95 latency96 runs
479208436895293689808-2209-14ms
Section 02

Quality scores

How this model compares to the rest of the field on each prompt category, from a pairwise fit over the same prompts. The raw judge score sits underneath each number.

9%
Coding
judge mean 37
48%
Creative
judge mean 76
43%
Factual
judge mean 61
25%
Multilingual
judge mean 63
10%
Reasoning
judge mean 21

Win rate per category: how often this model beats a field-average model on a prompt from that category. 50% is average, not a failing grade. It is not a percentage of correct answers.

Section 03

Pricing

What you pay per million tokens when you use this model on Tokonomix, plus an estimate for a typical conversation.

💰
API rates — Gemini 3.5 Flash
$2.25 per 1M input tokens
$13.46 per 1M output tokens
≈ $0.0040 per typical conversation (800 tokens)
Input vs output price (per 1M tokens)
per 1M input tokens$2.25
per 1M output tokens$13.46
Section 04

Tokens per second

Throughput in tokens per second, derived from measured P50 latency. Higher is better; fluctuations track provider-side load.

Throughput (tokens / s)216 / avg 238
41337

Estimated from P50 latency × 200 output tokens — the absolute number depends on this assumption; the trend is what matters.

Section 05

Strengths & weaknesses

Drawn from benchmark results and aggregated community feedback on real use-cases.

Strengths

Low-latency responses at scale1M+ token context windowStrong cost-to-throughput ratioHandles long document chainsBroad multilingual coverageStable Google API ecosystemSolid tool-use and function callingPredictable batch performance

Weaknesses

Weaker on hard reasoning tasksRegional availability variesFixed knowledge cutoffLimited generative modality coverage
Section 06

Capabilities

toolssource: litellmvisionjson modepdf inputreasoningaudio inputjson schemaparallel toolsprompt cachingoutputTokenLimit: 65536max output tokens: 65535
Section 07

Frequently asked questions

Choose Flash when you need high request volume, tight latency budgets, or long-context summarization. Move to a Pro tier when accuracy on multi-step reasoning or code synthesis is the deciding factor.

A solid Tier A workhorse when latency and context size matter more than frontier reasoning. Pick it for volume pipelines, not for your hardest reasoning calls.

Tokonomix verdict
Section 08

Availability

Availability

How often this model answers when we call it — measured across real API requests and live tests over the last 30 days. This is separate from quality: these numbers only tell you whether the model responds, not how good the answer is.

Last 7 days

100.0%

n=8

Last 30 days

100.0%

n=11

Median response time

8,901ms

n=11

Based on 324 measurements over the last 30 days.

Technical details

Only live API calls and live-test requests count — internal probes and benchmark runs are excluded.

Calls with a custom API key (BYOK) are excluded: those failures are key-specific, not a sign of model downtime.

Failed calls are NOT included in quality scores — quality is measured on successful responses only. Availability and quality are independent signals.

Median response time (p50) across successful calls with a recorded duration. Outliers (very slow or very fast calls) pull the median less than the average.

Total calls (30d)

11

OK responses (30d)

11

Total calls (7d)

8

OK responses (7d)

8

Section 09

Tokonomix benchmark verdicts

⚖️
Endorsed by 2 judges
Independent LLM judges evaluated this model on our weekly intelligence tests
cohere/command-a100/100 · 1 runs
1 correct0 partial0 wrong100% accuracy
claude-sonnet-4-550/100 · 84 runs
33 correct14 partial37 wrong39% accuracy
2026-09-13

Gemini 3.5 Flash shows significant quality decline, coding drops to zero

Gemini 3.5 Flash has experienced a notable performance degradation in the current benchmark window, with its overall quality score falling from 42.0 to 33.5 out of 100, representing an 8.5 point decline. The most alarming change is in coding capability, which has dropped from a score of 58 to 0, indicating a complete loss of function in this category. Meanwhile, factual question performance has improved from unmeasured in the previous window to 52, and reasoning capabilities have emerged at 49, both representing moderately competent performance levels. Latency has remained relatively stable, increasing slightly from 3530ms to 3705ms at the median. The previous window showed strength in creative tasks at 65, but this category was not tested in the current evaluation period. The dramatic shift in category coverage between windows makes direct comparison challenging, but the complete absence of coding capability and the lower overall score suggest users may encounter reliability issues, particularly for any programming-related tasks. The model maintains acceptable performance for factual queries and reasoning tasks, but the inconsistent results across benchmark windows raise concerns about stability.

Quality

33.5

Latency p50

3,705 ms

Test runs

5

Coding capability dropped to zero Quality declined 8.5 points overall Factual performance at 52 Reasoning capability maintained at 49
Section 10

Full model profile

Gemini 3.5 Flash: The Fast and Capable Workhorse of the Third Generation

In the fast-moving landscape of AI technologies, Google DeepMind's Gemini 3.5 Flash stands as a resilient model designed for high-speed inference and broad multimodal support. Positioned between the entry-level Gemini 3.0 Flash Preview and the advanced 3.x Pro, it offers a balanced blend of capability and cost that suits various production workloads. Its standout features include a 1 million token context window and comprehensive multimodal input capabilities, making it a robust choice for enterprises needing agility and depth. Our verdict: Ideal for teams needing a balance of speed, breadth, and reasoning at a justified cost — but prepare for premium output expenses.

Architecture & Training

The Gemini 3.5 Flash is part of the Gemini 3 generation, which is a significant step up from its predecessors in the Gemini lineup. While specific architectural details are not publicly disclosed, the third-generation models leverage advanced transformer-based architectures that offer enhanced reasoning capabilities, particularly evident in the Gemini 3.5 Flash's native support for chain-of-thought processing. This is likely facilitated by improvements in both model architecture and training methodologies.

The Gemini 3.5 Flash distinguishes itself from the Gemini 3.0 Flash Preview with higher throughput and a larger context window, a leap from the earlier model's capabilities. Compared to the more premium 3.x Pro, it provides a stable yet less costly alternative, sacrificing some of the additional layering and parameter complexities that come with the Pro version.

In terms of training data, while Google has not publicly disclosed the specific datasets or exact training cutoff, the Gemini 3.5 Flash benefits from a training regime that likely includes a vast array of multilingual and multimodal inputs. The model supports audio, video, PDF, and image inputs, confirming its versatility in handling complex, diverse information flows necessary for modern AI applications.

Where It Shines

Gemini 3.5 Flash impresses with five core strengths:

  1. Native Reasoning: Gemini 3.5 Flash excels in tasks requiring logical structuring and problem-solving, thanks to its built-in chain-of-thought processing. This enables users to tackle sophisticated scenarios without toggling options or additional configurations, particularly beneficial in high-stakes environments like legal research or complex data synthesis. For example, in the context of /usecases/reasoning, it demonstrates an ability to parse and process complex logical sequences effectively.

  2. Million-Token Context Window: With a context window of 1,048,576 tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash allows for unprecedented continuity in dialog and data processing. This capacity is especially valuable in applications like /usecases/data-extraction where large datasets must be analyzed in a single session, enabling comprehensive contextual understanding without frequent interruptions.

  3. Multimodal Breadth: The model supports audio, video, PDF, and image inputs, making it a versatile tool in fields like multimedia content aggregation and analysis. Tasks under /usecases/customer-service can benefit immensely from such capabilities, fuelling innovations in customer interaction technologies through richer, more interactive experiences.

  4. Web Search Grounding: Gemini 3.5 Flash incorporates web search grounding, enhancing its capacity to integrate real-time data and verification into responses. This feature is key for applications requiring updated and factual content extraction, crucial for /usecases/code in dynamically evolving code repositories or real-time transaction monitoring.

  5. Cost Positioning: Positioned between cheaper alternatives and premium tiers, Gemini 3.5 Flash offers a compelling value proposition. While it is more expensive than the 2.5 Flash, it delivers improved reasoning capabilities and multimodal support, making it cost-effective for entities requiring a robust, all-encompassing AI solution.

Where It Falls Short

Despite its strengths, Gemini 3.5 Flash presents several limitations that decision-makers need to consider:

  1. High Output Pricing: The model's output pricing of $9 per 1M tokens can be prohibitive for workflows that involve large-scale text generation, such as generating extensive reports or bulk content creation. It requires careful economic planning and perhaps limits its use in purely generative contexts where cost-efficiency is critical.

  2. Output Cap: The maximum output capacity of 65,535 tokens may be restrictive for certain extended generative tasks. While sufficient for most operational needs, using it in scenarios demanding long narrative generation or detailed proposals could present challenges.

  3. Unknowns: Key aspects such as the exact parameter count and the definitive knowledge cutoff date remain undisclosed. This lack of transparency could be a disadvantage when comparing to competitors who offer more explicit details about their model architectures and data policies.

  4. Competition: While cost and capability are in balance, competitors offer cheaper models that might be more appealing for straightforward use cases not requiring the extensive multimodal and reasoning capabilities of the Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Real-World Use Cases

Gemini 3.5 Flash shines in diverse real-world scenarios where its unique blend of speed, power, and breadth meets specific industry demands:

  1. Healthcare Documentation (Healthcare): Utilizing its capabilities in managing extensive context windows and multimodal inputs, Gemini 3.5 Flash can effectively generate and verify detailed medical reports. With input data from PDFs and relevant medical databases, it can parse complex medical histories, aiding in patient diagnosis documentation.

  2. Legal Document Analysis (Legal Sector): The model's native reasoning and long context management excel in the legal sector, processing lengthy legal documents to extract pertinent information, identify inconsistencies, and provide a summarized analysis, critical in legal review processes.

  3. Real-Time Financial Monitoring (Finance): By leveraging web search grounding alongside native interpretation skills, Gemini 3.5 Flash ensures financial analysts have the latest data points, indexing from current market news and updates to suggest adjustments in portfolio management.

  4. Educational Multimedia Content Creation (Education): The model's prowess in managing audio, video, and textual data concurrently allows educational content creators to develop interactive learning modules, which incorporate real-time feedback and updates drawn from recent academic publications.

Tokonomix Benchmark Snapshot

In our internal testing across different domains, Gemini 3.5 Flash consistently demonstrates excellence in reasoning and factual extraction, particularly surpassing benchmarks for complex logic sequence tasks. Its performance in multilingual capabilities and accurate coding task outputs aligns well with our expectations for high-end third-generation models. Its scores are regularly updated, reflecting steady reliability and functional versatility. For detailed comparative metrics, refer to our benchmark leaderboards.

EU Privacy & Data Residency

Hosted on Google Cloud's robust infrastructure, Gemini 3.5 Flash adheres to GDPR compliance, a necessity for organizations operating within or in conjunction with the European Union. Google provides comprehensive data residency options, facilitating secure operations across sectors like healthcare, legal, and public administration, which have stringent regulatory requirements for data protection. This compliance ensures the model can be integrated into workflows involving sensitive data with assurance of privacy standards being met.

Verdict & Alternatives

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the ideal choice for organizations requiring a high-performance, versatile AI model that manages complex multimodal input with significant reasoning capability. Those focused on budget constraints or valuing lower pricing might consider more economical models, such as the Gemini 3.0 Flash Preview, for simpler tasks. However, for teams demanding robust data insights and interaction, Gemini 3.5 Flash meets and exceeds expectations.

Looking forward, the Gemini 3 roadmap suggests progressive enhancements, particularly in refining spread task efficiencies and possibly addressing cost dynamics. Keeping abreast with updates will be critical for leveraging its full potential in evolving AI workflows.

Last technical review: 2026-05-27 — Tokonomix.ai

Last automated test
Sep 14, 2026 · 20:02 UTC · Speed benchmark
P50 latency
925 ms
P95 latency
1402 ms
Errors
0 / 6 runs
Last reviewed by Tokonomix Team·May 27, 2026