Top 10 AI models
| # | Model | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | gpt-5.1 | 72.9% |
| 2 | gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 | 72.7% |
| 3 | gpt-5.2-2025-12-11 | 69.6% |
| 4 | gpt-5.4 | 69.3% |
| 5 | gpt-5.2 | 69.2% |
| 6 | gpt-4.1 | 69.0% |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 68.5% |
| 8 | gpt-5.4-mini | 68.2% |
| 9 | GLM-4.7 | 68.1% |
| 10 | gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 | 67.7% |
Parallel Intelligence, Single Decision
Every question goes to several AI models at once, blind to each other. Their perspectives converge into one reliable answer.
Tokonomix is a multi-model AI consensus gateway and independent LLM benchmark. One OpenAI-compatible API key reaches every model we track; for high-stakes prompts, several frontier models answer in parallel and a cross-family judge reconciles them into one verdict — with each model's answer, tokens and cost itemised. Daily speed and quality benchmarks in six languages, published openly.
Connect the MCP
Enter a name, paste in https://mcp.tokonomix.ai, hit Add and log in through Tokonomix. From there Claude taps directly into Tokonomix's tools and data — no extra setup required.
Ask the council
Send one prompt through the connector and Tokonomix fans it out to several models at once, each blind to the others. You get one verdict back — plus what every model actually said, and what the round cost.
Top models, per capability
Same prompts, same conditions, measured through our own gateway. Quality score, latency and output price side by side — pick the tab that matches your workload.
Win rate against a field-average model on this capability’s prompts — 50% is average. Not a percentage of correct answers.
Live bench
| # | Model | Provider | Win rate | Latency | Output / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | gpt-5.1 | OpenAI | 70.9% | 2.75s | $13.00 |
| 02 | GLM-4.7 | Z.ai (GLM / Zhipu) | 70.3% | 101.94s | $3.29 |
| 03 | gpt-4.1 | OpenAI | 69.3% | 1.76s | $11.96 |
| 04 | gpt-5.2 | OpenAI | 66.9% | 2.53s | $18.20 |
| 05 | gpt-5.4 | OpenAI | 63.3% | 2.63s | $19.50 |
| 06 | gpt-5.4-mini | OpenAI | 61.4% | 1.72s | $6.73 |
7-day rolling average · last test Sep 13
Judge verdicts
4,526 evaluations across 54 models — verdict counts only, never customer prompts.
Neutral judge
Ranked on accuracy · minimum 10 judged runs
| # | Model | Verdicts | Accurate | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 | 97% | 145 | |
| 02 | gpt-5.4 | 96% | 56 | |
| 03 | gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 | 96% | 56 | |
| 04 | gpt-4.1-mini | 95% | 147 | |
| 05 | gpt-5.2 | 95% | 56 | |
| 06 | gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 | 95% | 56 | |
| 07 | gpt-5.4-mini | 95% | 56 | |
| 08 | gpt-4.1 | 95% | 147 |
Ship flawless AI images, every time.
5 AI models inspect every image for the flaws humans spot first: extra fingers, broken shadows, impossible physics.. etc.
New · early access
BETA 2026-07 · LOKI-35 + Real Control Photos · Not a Product Guarantee.
3 of 5 saw it. One model alone would have missed it — hence a council.
Pricing
Pick the plan that fits your volume
Every tier is the same product — only the monthly included consensus checks and the token margin change. Pay-as-you-go works on all of them.
Free
Try consensus on your own prompts
€0/ month
- 100 consensus checks / month
- Single-model calls always fee-free
- Every token itemised
Starter
Steady, low-volume checking
€10/ month
- 500 consensus checks / month
- Token margin +4%
- Saved BYOK key-sets
Studio
Most popularFor builders shipping verification
€25/ month
- 2,000 consensus checks / month
- Token margin +3%
- All council sizes — 2 to 5 models
Scale
Consensus in production
€50/ month
- 5,000 consensus checks / month
- Lowest token margin — +2%
- Usage dashboard + budget alerts
Founders prices, locked through 2027 · pay-as-you-go available on every tier