Skip to content

Game Scoreboard — this year

Everything the games collect, on one board — model win-rates, jury upvotes, judge integrity, blind-spot detection, council-vs-frontier value and a champion per capability. All numbers are computed live from real rounds.

A deeper analytics surface than the recent-rounds strip. Pick a time window below; each window has its own URL.

Recent games

33
games played
46
models in the arena
63
judge evaluations
3
head-to-head user votes
17 🔍
blind spots caught by the jury (our signature metric · rolling out)

Top models — game performance win-rate across all rounds in the window

Computed live from game rounds: games, wins/losses, jury upvotes, rounds-as-judge. live

#ModelGamesW–LWin-rateJury ▲As judge
1Claude Opus 4.622–0
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
gemini-pro-latest×1
gpt-5.4×1
gpt-5-mini×1
0
2Qwen 3.6 Plus22–0
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-7×1
claude-sonnet-4-6×1
Meta-Llama-3_3-70B-Instruct×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
3Claude Opus 511–0
▲ 00
4gpt-5-chat-latest11–0
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
qwen/qwen3.6-plus×1
qwen/qwen3.7-max×1
0
5Claude Opus 411–0
▲ 1
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-7×1
0
6gpt-5.2-chat-latest11–0
▲ 1
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-7×1
0
7Gemini 2.5 Pro54–1
▲ 10
Upvoted by (judge models):
gpt-4o×3
claude-haiku-4-5×3
gemini-flash-latest×3
claude-opus-4-7×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
8Claude Opus 4.795–4
▲ 17
Upvoted by (judge models):
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×3
claude-opus-4-7×3
gpt-5.4×2
gpt-5-mini×1
gemini-pro-latest×1
7
9Claude Opus 4.863–3
▲ 2
Upvoted by (judge models):
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
gpt-5-mini×1
2
10Claude Sonnet 4.642–2
▲ 5
Upvoted by (judge models):
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
gpt-5-mini×1
gpt-5.3-chat-latest×1
claude-opus-4-7×1
gpt-5.2×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
11Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct21–1
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-8×1
gpt-5.5×1
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
gpt-5.4×1
0
12Llama 4 Scout21–1
▲ 1
Upvoted by (judge models):
gemini-3.5-flash×1
0
13Claude Haiku 4.5104–6
▲ 18
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×3
claude-opus-4-7×3
gemini-2.5-flash×2
qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct×2
gemini-3.5-flash×1
2
Voted for (as judge):
14Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct31–2
▲ 00
15Claude Opus 4.531–2
▲ 7
Upvoted by (judge models):
gpt-5-mini×2
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
gemini-pro-latest×1
gpt-5.4×1
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
16gpt-4.151–4
▲ 15
Upvoted by (judge models):
gemini-flash-latest×5
gpt-4o×4
claude-haiku-4-5×3
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
gemini-2.5-flash×1
0
17gpt-4o-mini51–4
▲ 14
Upvoted by (judge models):
gpt-4o×5
gemini-flash-latest×5
claude-haiku-4-5×4
0
18gpt-oss-20b61–5
▲ 00
19DeepSeek v4 Pro50–5
▲ 5
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
minimax/minimax-m2.5×1
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
gemini-2.5-pro×1
4
20Claude Fable 540–4
▲ 7
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
qwen/qwen3.6-plus×1
gemini-2.5-flash×1
gemini-3.5-flash×1
claude-opus-4-8×1
0
21Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.340–4
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-8×1
gpt-5.5×1
claude-opus-4-5-20251101×1
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
22Llama 3.3 70B Instruct40–4
▲ 6
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-7×2
gemini-pro-latest×1
gemini-3.5-flash×1
claude-sonnet-4-6×1
Meta-Llama-3_3-70B-Instruct×1
5
Voted for (as judge):
23gpt-5.520–2
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-7×1
gemini-pro-latest×1
gemini-3.5-flash×1
2
Voted for (as judge):
24gpt-520–2
▲ 00
25Qwen3.5-9B10–1
▲ 00
26Claude Sonnet 510–1
▲ 00
27GLM-4.510–1
▲ 2
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-8×1
gpt-5.5×1
0
28Meta-Llama-3_3-70B-Instruct10–1
▲ 2
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-opus-4-8×1
gpt-5.5×1
1
Voted for (as judge):
29Cohere Command-A10–1
▲ 00
30Gemini 3.5 Flash10–1
▲ 0
2
Voted for (as judge):
31Antigravity Agent Preview10–1
▲ 00
32gpt-4.1-nano10–1
▲ 00
33DeepSeek v3.210–1
▲ 1
Upvoted by (judge models):
gemini-3.5-flash×1
0
34Nous Hermes 3 70B10–1
▲ 00
35Claude Opus 4.110–1
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
minimax/minimax-m2.5×1
0
36Claude Sonnet 4.510–1
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
minimax/minimax-m2.5×1
0
37Deep Research Preview (Apr-21-2026)10–1
▲ 00
38Deep Research Max Preview (Apr-21-2026)10–1
▲ 00
39gpt-4-turbo10–1
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct×1
qwen/qwen3.7-max×1
0
40Gemini 2.5 Flash10–1
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
gemini-2.5-flash×1
gemini-flash-latest×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
2
Voted for (as judge):
41Gemini Pro Latest10–1
▲ 0
2
Voted for (as judge):
42gpt-4o-2024-05-1310–1
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
gemini-2.5-flash×1
gemini-flash-latest×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
0
43gpt-5.5-2026-04-2310–1
▲ 4
Upvoted by (judge models):
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001×1
gemini-2.5-flash×1
gemini-flash-latest×1
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct×1
0
44gpt-5.4-2026-03-0510–1
▲ 1
Upvoted by (judge models):
gpt-5.3-chat-latest×1
0
45gpt-4o10–1
▲ 3
Upvoted by (judge models):
gpt-4o×1
claude-haiku-4-5×1
gemini-flash-latest×1
5
Voted for (as judge):
46Gemini Flash Latest10–1
▲ 0
7
▲ win-ratejury ▲ = panel judges that endorsed this model — click to see whichas-judge = rounds it scored others

Champion per capability This year

Top win-rate model that has each capability and played in the window. live

🧠 reasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
2–0 · 100%
⚙ tool-use
Claude Opus 4.6
2–0 · 100%
👁 vision
Claude Opus 4.6
2–0 · 100%
📋 json-schema
Claude Opus 4.6
2–0 · 100%
🎧 audio
Gemini 2.5 Pro
4–1 · 80%

Judge integrity board the flywheel — who scores in line with the panel

Per judge model: evaluations cast and how often its pick matched the round winner. live

JudgeEvalsAgreement
claude-opus-4-77
gpt-5.52
gemini-2.5-flash2
gemini-3.5-flash2
qwen/qwen2.5-vl-72b-instruct2
qwen/qwen3.6-plus1
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick1
minimax/minimax-m2.51
gemini-2.5-pro1
claude-opus-4-5-202511011
claude-sonnet-4-61
Meta-Llama-3_3-70B-Instruct1
gpt-5.3-chat-latest1
gpt-5.21
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct5
gpt-4o5
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro4
claude-haiku-4-54
gpt-5.43
gemini-flash-latest7
claude-opus-4-82
qwen/qwen3.7-max2
gpt-5-mini2
gemini-pro-latest2
claude-haiku-4-5-202510012
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.31
Agreement = share of this judge's picks that matched the round's elected winner.

User & game votes

How the panel and humans voted.

Game (panel) votes cast63live
Community ▲ upvotes33all-time
Head-to-head user votes3live
"Wanted model" votes—live
Sources: judge_panel · model_arena_activity.upvotes_received · votes · wanted_votes

🔍 Blind spots detected by the jury — our trademark metric, no other board has it

The signature Tokonomix number: per model, how many blind spots the jury caught vs created — confirmed only when ≥2 panel judges agree it is a real omission.

ModelCaughtCreatedNet insight
Claude Opus 4.630+3
Qwen 3.6 Plus12-1
Claude Opus 4.701-1
Claude Opus 4.810+1
Llama 4 Scout10+1
Claude Haiku 4.542+2
DeepSeek v4 Pro23-1
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct21+1
gpt-5.512-1
DeepSeek v3.201-1
Nous Hermes 3 70B01-1
Claude Opus 4.131+2
Claude Sonnet 4.530+3
Deep Research Preview (Apr-21-2026)22+0
Deep Research Max Preview (Apr-21-2026)21+1
A signature Tokonomix metric — no other board shows it. Lands when the arena emits blind-spots (opt-in, never on public games — cost-gated).

Council vs Frontier cheaper AND/OR smarter?

Consensus teams of cheap models vs a single premium frontier — win-rate and € saved. live

MatchupWinnerQualityCostVerdict
Council A vs Frontier BFrontier B68 vs 86€0.007 vs €0.187frontier won
Council A vs Frontier BCouncil A76.67 vs 83.33€0.210 vs €0.32335% cheaper & won
Council A vs Frontier CFrontier C60.67 vs 86€0.136 vs €0.088frontier won
Council A vs Frontier Ctie54.67 vs 57.67€0.007 vs €0.09493% cheaper & won
Council A vs Frontier BFrontier B71.67 vs 94.33€0.086 vs €0.049frontier won
Council A vs Frontier BFrontier B61.67 vs 91€0.028 vs €0.044frontier won
Council A vs Frontier BFrontier B78 vs 85€0.049 vs €0.049frontier won
Council A vs Frontier CFrontier C72 vs 92€0.027 vs €0.017frontier won
The core Tokonomix narrative, quantified per matchup. Cost is dispatch-only (judge overhead excluded).

💶 Cost: spent vs saved what the consensus story is worth, in €

Total € spent on games in this window, and € saved when a cheaper council matched or beat a premium frontier. live

€8.88
total game spend (window)
€0.113
saved vs always-frontier (contestant cost only)
35%
avg cost cut when council won/tied
⚠ Calc rule: In council games the judge panel is neutral overhead — it costs the same regardless of who plays, so it does NOT count toward "saved". Savings = frontier contestant cost − council contestant cost only; per_player_cost is dispatch-only.

Per-model game history click any model → its full game history

Every model name links to its model page; a dedicated, time-filtered per-model game history (every round it played, with match summaries) is rolling out — a fresh, internally-linked surface that grows as games run.

Everything marked live ships from real rounds now; rolling-out metrics land with Fase C.
← Back to the arena