Naar inhoud
Draait in:FranceGemaakt in:United States

Gearchiveerd

Dit model is door de aanbieder uit productie genomen. Historische data blijft bewaard.

Niet meer beschikbaar sinds 28 juni 2026.

OVH AI Endpoints (GRA)

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Tokonomix-redactie·Gecontroleerd door Mes Kalkan··
Sectie 01

Prijsgeschiedenis

Directe provider-tarieven per miljoen tokens, plus een typische gespreks-kostschatting.

💰
API-tarieven — Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
$0.1000 per 1M input-tokens
$0.1000 per 1M output-tokens
≈ <$0.0001 per typisch gesprek (800 tokens)
Input vs output prijs (per 1M tokens)
per 1M input-tokens$0.1000
per 1M output-tokens$0.1000

Pricing over time

Input & output per 1M tokens · step-line = price changes

$0.1000

input / 1M

— stable

$0.1000

output / 1M

— stable

2026-06-142026-06-142026-06-21
Input
Output
Price change
⟳ synced weekly
Sectie 02

Mogelijkheden

ownedBy: meta-llama
Sectie 03

Beschikbaarheid

Beschikbaarheid

Nog geen meetdata

Er zijn nog niet genoeg API-aanroepen geregistreerd om beschikbaarheidsstatistieken voor dit model te tonen. Data verschijnt zodra het model live verkeer ontvangt.

Sectie 04

Tokonomix benchmark-oordelen

⚖️
Endorsed by 1 judge
Independent LLM judges evaluated this model on our weekly intelligence tests
claude-sonnet-4-586/100 · 23 runs
15 correct7 partial1 wrong65% accuracy
2026-06-21

Quality drops 29 points as performance degrades across all categories

Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct by OVH AI Endpoints has experienced a significant decline in performance this benchmark window. The overall quality score plummeted from 99.0 to 70.3, representing a 28.7-point drop that affects the model's competitive standing. The degradation is evident across all measured categories, with factual accuracy scoring just 57, reasoning at 74, and multilingual capabilities at 80. This contrasts sharply with the previous window where coding achieved 100, multilingual scored 97, and reasoning reached 100. The current window shows a different category composition, making direct comparisons complex, but the overall trend is unmistakably negative. On a positive note, latency has improved slightly from 9119ms to 7942ms at the median, offering users marginally faster response times. However, this speed gain is overshadowed by the substantial quality regression. Testing consistency remains stable with five runs in both windows. Users relying on this endpoint should be aware of the current performance limitations, particularly for fact-dependent tasks where the model now scores below 60. The cause of this regression warrants investigation to determine whether it stems from infrastructure changes, model configuration, or other factors.

Kwaliteit

70.3

Latency p50

7,942 ms

Testruns

5

Quality dropped 29 points Factual accuracy now only 57 Latency improved to 7942ms Reasoning declined significantly
Laatste automatische test
28 jun 2026 · 05:12 UTC · Benchmark
P50 latency
P95 latency
Fouten
1 / 6 runs
Laatst beoordeeld door Tokonomix-team·28 juni 2026