Skip to content
Tier A — Frontier
Runs in:CNMade in:China
Z.ai (GLM / Zhipu)

GLM-5.2

Tier A — Frontier · 205K tokens

Tokonomix Editorial Team·Reviewed by Mes Kalkan··

GLM-5.2 is, as of July 2026, the most recent and highest-priced model in Zhipu’s GLM line that we can reach through z.ai. z.ai positions it as a reasoning-first flagship — the top of the GLM-5 generation — and it is the GLM model you would reach for when answer quality matters more than cost.

Section 01

Speed analysis

Latency measured across all benchmark runs. P50 (median) and P95 (95th percentile) give a realistic picture of response speed under normal and peak load.

P50 latency (median)P95 latency105 runs
1423653011637167442185108-1609-11ms
Section 02

Quality scores

How this model compares to the rest of the field on each prompt category, from a pairwise fit over the same prompts. The raw judge score sits underneath each number.

56%
Coding
judge mean 71
4%
Creative
judge mean 40
55%
Factual
judge mean 75
20%
Reasoning
judge mean 30

Win rate per category: how often this model beats a field-average model on a prompt from that category. 50% is average, not a failing grade. It is not a percentage of correct answers.

Section 03

Pricing history

Direct provider rates per million tokens, plus a typical-conversation cost estimate.

💰
API rates — GLM-5.2
$1.40 per 1M input tokens
$4.40 per 1M output tokens
≈ $0.0017 per typical conversation (800 tokens)
Input vs output price (per 1M tokens)
per 1M input tokens$1.40
per 1M output tokens$4.40

Pricing over time

Input & output per 1M tokens · step-line = price changes

$1.40

input / 1M

— stable

$4.40

output / 1M

— stable

2026-07-122026-08-092026-09-06
Input
Output
Price change
⟳ synced weekly
Section 04

Tokens per second

Throughput in tokens per second, derived from measured P50 latency. Higher is better; fluctuations track provider-side load.

Throughput (tokens / s)65 / avg 79
14021

Estimated from P50 latency × 200 output tokens — the absolute number depends on this assumption; the trend is what matters.

Section 05

Capabilities

jsonnotes: GLM emits a non-standard reasoning_content field beside content; read content for the answer.toolsreasoning
Section 06

Availability

Availability

How often this model answers when we call it — measured across real API requests and live tests over the last 30 days. This is separate from quality: these numbers only tell you whether the model responds, not how good the answer is.

Last 7 days

100.0%

n=5

Last 30 days

100.0%

n=5

Median response time

39,266ms

n=5

Based on 381 measurements over the last 30 days.

Technical details

Only live API calls and live-test requests count — internal probes and benchmark runs are excluded.

Calls with a custom API key (BYOK) are excluded: those failures are key-specific, not a sign of model downtime.

Failed calls are NOT included in quality scores — quality is measured on successful responses only. Availability and quality are independent signals.

Median response time (p50) across successful calls with a recorded duration. Outliers (very slow or very fast calls) pull the median less than the average.

Total calls (30d)

5

OK responses (30d)

5

Total calls (7d)

5

OK responses (7d)

5

Section 07

Tokonomix benchmark verdicts

⚖️
Endorsed by 1 judge
Independent LLM judges evaluated this model on our weekly intelligence tests
claude-sonnet-4-558/100 · 27 runs
11 correct2 partial14 wrong41% accuracy
2026-09-06

GLM-5.2 adds JSON, tools, and reasoning modes without performance data

GLM-5.2 has introduced three new capability modes: JSON output formatting, tool use functionality, and a reasoning mode. These represent a significant expansion of the model's feature set compared to the previous benchmark window. However, no performance metrics are available in the current benchmark window to assess the quality or effectiveness of these new capabilities. The absence of benchmark results means users cannot yet evaluate how well the model performs core tasks like language understanding, generation quality, instruction following, or how the new features compare to competing models. The previous window also lacked performance data, suggesting ongoing challenges with benchmark participation or data availability. While the addition of structured output, tool integration, and enhanced reasoning capabilities aligns with current industry trends and user demands, potential adopters should seek independent testing or trial implementations to validate these features meet their requirements before deployment.

Quality

Latency p50

Test runs

0

JSON output mode added Tool use capability introduced Reasoning mode now available No performance benchmarks available
Section 08

Full model profile

GLM-5.2: Zhipu’s newest flagship, reasoning-first

GLM-5.2 is, as of July 2026, the most recent and highest-priced model in Zhipu’s GLM line that we can reach through z.ai. z.ai positions it as a reasoning-first flagship — the top of the GLM-5 generation — and it is the GLM model you would reach for when answer quality matters more than cost.

z.ai publishes GLM-5.2 at $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens — the most expensive tier in the GLM family, reflecting its flagship positioning.

We registered it with a large (~200K-token) context window as a provisional figure — enough for long documents or multi-file code review in one call, but GLM-5-generation documentation is thin, so confirm the exact window on z.ai before relying on it.

Architecture & training signals

GLM (General Language Model) is Zhipu AI’s model family; GLM-5.2 is the current top of the GLM-5 generation. Public technical documentation for the GLM-5 series is still thin as of July 2026, so we describe it conservatively: it is a large reasoning-oriented chat model with tool-calling and structured-output (JSON) support, reachable over an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Like the rest of the GLM line, it returns a non-standard reasoning_content field alongside content in its OpenAI-compatible responses; integrations should read content for the final answer and treat reasoning_content as an optional trace.

Where it shines

  • Hard reasoning, multi-step problems and tasks where you want the model to "think" before answering.
  • Long-context work — large documents, transcripts or codebases that fit its ~200K window.
  • Tool-calling and JSON-structured outputs for agentic pipelines.

Where it falls short

  • It is the priciest GLM model — for routine or high-volume work the cheaper GLM-4.x or free flash tiers are usually the better economic choice.
  • Limited independent, reproducible benchmark coverage so far; claims about its ceiling should be verified on your own workload.
  • Non-EU hosting rules it out for EU-data-residency-sensitive tasks.

Real-world use cases

  • Complex analysis or synthesis where a second, decorrelated opinion is valuable in a consensus panel.
  • Long-document question answering and summarisation.
  • Agentic workflows that need reliable tool-calls and JSON.

Tokonomix benchmark snapshot

GLM-5.2 is newly registered on Tokonomix and not yet activated, so we have not run it through our weekly intelligence test or speed benchmark. There are no Tokonomix scores to report yet — and we will not invent any.

When it goes live, it enters the same weekly harness as every other model: identical prompts, an independent cross-family judge, and reproducible latency and cost measurements. Until then, treat the pricing and capability notes on this page as the vendor-published starting point, not as measured Tokonomix results.

EU privacy & data residency

GLM-5.2 is built by Zhipu AI (z.ai), a China-headquartered lab, and is served from non-EU infrastructure. This is important to state plainly: routing a prompt to this model is not an EU-data-residency or GDPR-sovereign choice, and Tokonomix will never tag it as one.

If your use case requires data to stay within the EU, pick a model whose provider is EU-hosted (for example our OVH or Azure-EU routes) rather than a GLM model. Tokonomix keeps z.ai out of every EU-only / sovereign routing set by design. Use GLM where its capability or price is the priority and cross-border processing is acceptable for that workload.

Verdict & alternatives

GLM-5.2 is the GLM flagship: reach for it when you want Zhipu’s most capable current GLM tier and can absorb the higher token price. For cheaper day-to-day work, step down to GLM-4.7 or GLM-4.6; for zero-cost experimentation, the GLM-4.7 Flash / GLM-4.5 Flash free tiers. As a consensus proposer it is useful precisely because it is a different model family from the usual US frontier labs.

Last automated test
Sep 11, 2026 · 08:03 UTC · Speed benchmark
P50 latency
3095 ms
P95 latency
3274 ms
Errors
0 / 6 runs
Last reviewed by Tokonomix Team·July 8, 2026