Skip to content
Tier A — Frontier
Runs in:FranceMade in:China
OVH AI Endpoints (GRA)

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Tier A — Frontier

Tokonomix Editorial Team·Reviewed by Mes Kalkan·
Section 01

Speed analysis

Latency measured across all benchmark runs. P50 (median) and P95 (95th percentile) give a realistic picture of response speed under normal and peak load.

P50 latency (median)P95 latency104 runs
20643278447125681668810-0410-30ms
Section 02

Quality scores

How this model compares to the rest of the field on each prompt category, from a pairwise fit over the same prompts. The raw judge score sits underneath each number.

53%
Coding
judge mean 89
7%
Creative
judge mean 43
5%
Factual
judge mean 14
35%
Multilingual
judge mean 46
6%
Reasoning
judge mean 1

Win rate per category: how often this model beats a field-average model on a prompt from that category. 50% is average, not a failing grade. It is not a percentage of correct answers.

Section 03

Pricing

What you pay per million tokens when you use this model on Tokonomix, plus an estimate for a typical conversation.

💰
API rates — Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
$0.9000 per 1M input tokens
$5.39 per 1M output tokens
≈ $0.0016 per typical conversation (800 tokens)
Input vs output price (per 1M tokens)
per 1M input tokens$0.9000
per 1M output tokens$5.39
Section 04

Tokens per second

Throughput in tokens per second, derived from measured P50 latency. Higher is better; fluctuations track provider-side load.

Throughput (tokens / s)613 / avg 515
96133

Estimated from P50 latency × 200 output tokens — the absolute number depends on this assumption; the trend is what matters.

Section 05

Capabilities

ownedBy: Qwen
Section 06

Availability

Availability

How often this model answers when we call it — measured across real API requests and live tests over the last 30 days. This is separate from quality: these numbers only tell you whether the model responds, not how good the answer is.

Last 7 days

—

Last 30 days

100.0%

n=30

Median response time

4,242ms

n=30

Based on 410 measurements over the last 30 days.

Technical details

Only live API calls and live-test requests count — internal probes and benchmark runs are excluded.

Calls with a custom API key (BYOK) are excluded: those failures are key-specific, not a sign of model downtime.

Failed calls are NOT included in quality scores — quality is measured on successful responses only. Availability and quality are independent signals.

Median response time (p50) across successful calls with a recorded duration. Outliers (very slow or very fast calls) pull the median less than the average.

Total calls (30d)

30

OK responses (30d)

30

Total calls (7d)

0

OK responses (7d)

0

Section 07

Tokonomix benchmark verdicts

⚖️
Endorsed by 2 judges
Independent LLM judges evaluated this model on our weekly intelligence tests
cohere/command-a100/100 · 1 runs
1 correct0 partial0 wrong100% accuracy
claude-sonnet-4-550/100 · 79 runs
33 correct3 partial43 wrong42% accuracy
● 2026-10-25

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B quality drops to 72.5, latency doubles from previous window

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B experienced significant performance degradation in the current benchmark window. The overall quality score fell from a perfect 100 to 72.5, representing a substantial 27.5-point decline. Coding performance, the only category tested in both windows, dropped from 100 to 73, indicating reduced capability in this core area. Multilingual support, which was present and scored perfectly in the previous window, was not evaluated in the current testing period. Latency increased dramatically, with the median response time more than doubling from 3916 ms to 8128 ms, a 108% increase that will impact user experience significantly. The limited test sample of only 2 runs in each window suggests these results should be interpreted cautiously, as broader testing may reveal different patterns. Users currently relying on this model for coding tasks should be aware of the performance decline and increased response times. The absence of multilingual testing in this window leaves questions about whether that capability remains stable or has also degraded.

Quality

72.5

Latency p50

8,128 ms

Test runs

2

✗ Quality dropped 27.5 points✗ Latency increased 108%✗ Coding score fell to 73✗ Multilingual category not tested
Section 08

Full model profile

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: a 397-billion-parameter model that only wakes up 17 billion at a time

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is Alibaba's Qwen team's follow-up to the Qwen3 generation, released as open weights under an Apache 2.0 license in early 2026. The name states the architecture directly: 397 billion total parameters, with roughly 17 billion active for any given token. It is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts model, and Qwen positions it as a unified vision-language foundation — a single model trained from the start on text, images, and video together, rather than a text model with a vision adapter bolted on afterward.

Under the hood

According to Qwen's own model documentation, the architecture pairs Gated DeltaNet — a linear-attention mechanism — with sparse MoE routing across 60 layers, arranged as repeating blocks of linear-attention-plus-MoE with periodic full-attention layers mixed in. The MoE layer itself carries 512 experts, of which 11 are activated per token: 10 routed experts chosen dynamically plus one shared expert that is always active. That combination — mostly-linear attention for efficiency, MoE for capacity, occasional full attention for the kind of long-range dependency linear attention alone struggles with — is what lets a model with 397 billion total parameters run at roughly the compute cost of a 17-billion-parameter dense model per token.

Context length is 262,144 tokens natively, and Qwen documents extension up to roughly 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN scaling — a technique that adjusts the model's positional encoding to generalize beyond its trained context length, typically with some quality trade-off the further past the native window a request pushes.

Where it shines

Qwen reports strong results on its own benchmark suite: 87.8 on MMLU-Pro, 70.4 on SuperGPQA, and 94.8 on the HMMT February 2025 math competition set, alongside 85.0 on MMMU and 86.7 on MLVU for image and video understanding respectively. These are Qwen's own published figures rather than independently reproduced numbers, so they should be read as the vendor's account of the model's own progress — but taken together they describe a model built for broad, general-purpose reasoning and multimodal understanding rather than a narrow specialist.

The open-weights license is itself a practical advantage: Apache 2.0 permits self-hosting, fine-tuning, and redistribution without the licensing friction that comes with a closed API-only model, which matters for teams that need to run inference on their own infrastructure or adapt the model to a narrow domain.

Where it falls short

Qwen's own documentation frames this release as "cross-generational parity with Qwen3" on many dimensions — meaning the gains over the prior generation are presented as broad and incremental rather than a step-change, and language in the model card is careful not to claim a dramatic leap. As with any Mixture-of-Experts model, the discrepancy between total and active parameters means the model needs far more memory to hold in full than its per-token compute cost would suggest — 397 billion parameters have to be resident somewhere even though only a fraction fire on any given request, which shapes what hardware self-hosting actually requires.

When to pick it

This model fits general-purpose reasoning, coding, and multimodal workloads where a team wants either the option to self-host or the cost profile of a very large model without paying full dense-model compute per request. It is a reasonable default for teams already invested in the Qwen ecosystem, or for workloads that need a genuinely large native context window without leaning on aggressive scaling tricks.

Alternatives worth comparing

The predecessor Qwen3 generation remains available for teams that do not need the added vision and video understanding this release adds. For workloads that need a smaller footprint, Qwen has also shipped considerably smaller models in the same family line that trade some capability for a much lighter memory footprint — worth benchmarking directly against this model on the specific task before committing to the larger one.

Last automated test
Oct 30, 2026 · 02:03 UTC · Speed benchmark
P50 latency
326 ms
P95 latency
376 ms
Errors
0 / 6 runs
Last reviewed by Tokonomix Team·September 14, 2026